<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tabouli Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://11mystics.com/2007/05/09/tabouli-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://11mystics.com/2007/05/09/tabouli-updates/</link>
	<description>The Art of Spirit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 23:27:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne</title>
		<link>http://11mystics.com/2007/05/09/tabouli-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1900</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://11mystics.com/blog/2007/05/09/tabouli-updates/#comment-1900</guid>
		<description>Hey Allan - contact me if you want to upgrade and I&#039;ll fix you up without having to pay the full price again.
&lt;p&gt;And um... not sure who&#039;s doing the critique, but the issue you describe was on my options page and that was not a theme problem. Who thought that? It was related to a text box on a Blocks plug-in page. IE always interprets pixels to be wider than they should be. I had to make a text box on my page narrower so IE wouldn&#039;t overshoot the page width. That has everything to do with designing a Blocks page, not the theme. Any experienced RW person should have been able see that. If it had been a theme issue, you would have seen the problem on every page, not just that one.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Allan &#8211; contact me if you want to upgrade and I&#8217;ll fix you up without having to pay the full price again.</p>
<p>And um&#8230; not sure who&#8217;s doing the critique, but the issue you describe was on my options page and that was not a theme problem. Who thought that? It was related to a text box on a Blocks plug-in page. IE always interprets pixels to be wider than they should be. I had to make a text box on my page narrower so IE wouldn&#8217;t overshoot the page width. That has everything to do with designing a Blocks page, not the theme. Any experienced RW person should have been able see that. If it had been a theme issue, you would have seen the problem on every page, not just that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allan</title>
		<link>http://11mystics.com/2007/05/09/tabouli-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1899</link>
		<dc:creator>allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 18:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://11mystics.com/blog/2007/05/09/tabouli-updates/#comment-1899</guid>
		<description>Exellent theme! I love all the options and the eye-popping colors.

Question: If I buy the standard version and want to upgrade to the pro version later, would I have to pay full price or an upgrade price?

Also, somebody pointed out a problem in IE 6 where the content is pushed down.

Has this been fixed yet?

Keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exellent theme! I love all the options and the eye-popping colors.</p>
<p>Question: If I buy the standard version and want to upgrade to the pro version later, would I have to pay full price or an upgrade price?</p>
<p>Also, somebody pointed out a problem in IE 6 where the content is pushed down.</p>
<p>Has this been fixed yet?</p>
<p>Keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
